Start here
The short answer
Evaluate Zapier for straightforward app connections and Make for visual scenario design. Verify the required triggers and actions, then model billable tasks or credits before choosing on cost.
Editorial pickMake
At a glance
Scroll horizontally to view every column. Select a column heading to sort.
| Best for | Starting price | Free plan | Free trial | Key feature | Industries | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZapierView website (opens in a new tab) | Small operators who need to connect apps without hiring a developer and are willing to pay for reliability. | $19.99 / month (Professional, 750 tasks, billed annually) | Yes | Yes | A large integration catalog and configurable app workflows. | Small business, Agencies, Professional services |
| MakeEditorial pickView website (opens in a new tab) | Operators who need complex branching automations and want to pay for operations, not tasks. | $9.00 / month (Core, 10,000 credits, billed annually) | Yes | Yes | The visual node editor makes complex multi-branch workflows readable and maintainable. | Small business, Agencies |
A dash means no value has been supplied. Price sorting is unavailable when currencies or billing periods differ.
Best for Small operators who need to connect apps without hiring a developer and are willing to pay for reliability.
Zapier
A workflow automation platform connecting business applications through triggers and actions.
Pricing
Starting at $19.99 / month (Professional, 750 tasks, billed annually)
Free tier plus task-based subscription
Verified
Pros
- Free tier includes 100 tasks per month.
- Professional offers multiple task tiers.
- Team starts with 2,000 tasks and up to 25 users.
Cons
- Billable task usage depends on the actions performed.
- Verify the exact trigger and action, not just whether an app appears in the catalog.
Sources & references
- Zapier official pricing — month (Professional, billed annually) — ZapierAccessed
- Zapier official homepage — ZapierAccessed
Best for Operators who need complex branching automations and want to pay for operations, not tasks.
Make
A visual automation platform with a node-based editor, positioned as the power-user alternative to Zapier.
Pricing
Starting at $9.00 / month (Core, 10,000 credits, billed annually)
Free tier plus operations-based subscription
Verified
Pros
- Visual scenarios support branching and data mapping.
- Core at 10,000 credits is $9 monthly equivalent annually or $12 billed monthly.
- Free tier includes 1,000 monthly credits.
Cons
- Credits are not interchangeable with another vendor's tasks or executions.
- Module capabilities and billable credit use need checking for the actual workflow.
Sources & references
- Official product reference — MakeAccessed
Pros
- Both offer free tiers with usage limits.
- Both provide workflow automation and integrations.
- Both offer AI-related capabilities whose usage and plan limits need checking.
Cons
- Zapier task pricing gets painful fast at real volumes.
- Make has a steeper learning curve than the marketing suggests.
The one-sentence version
If you are new to automation and building a small number of simple workflows, Zapier. If you are running any real volume, need complex logic, or you have already built a few automations and know what you are doing, Make.
The overlap in the middle is small. Zapier is best when the workflow is easy and you value speed. Make is best when the workflow is hard or high-volume and you value control and cost.
Some businesses may need both because a required trigger or action is available in only one. Check that requirement before adding a second subscription; this article does not document how many operators use both.
Learning curve reality
Zapier is easier to start with. You pick a trigger, pick an action, map fields, and you have a working automation. The mental model is linear: this then that.
Make uses a visual scenario editor with modules and data mapping. Budget learning time for the workflow you intend to build; the evidence reviewed does not establish a fixed one-week learning period.
Make's visual layout may suit complex branches. Zapier also supports conditional workflows, so demonstrate the same scenario in both before deciding which is easier to maintain.
The useful test is whether your team can understand, debug, and maintain the intended automation. Neither editor choice establishes a permanent capability ceiling.
Pricing at real usage: tasks and credits differ
Zapier Free includes 100 tasks per month. Professional starts at $19.99 USD per month billed annually for 750 tasks. Operating the current USD Professional selector at 2,000 tasks shows $49 per month billed annually or $73.50 billed monthly. Team starts at $69 per month billed annually with 2,000 tasks and up to 25 users.
Make Free includes 1,000 credits per month. At 10,000 credits, Core is $9 per month billed annually or $12 billed monthly; Pro is $21 monthly and Teams is $38 monthly. Make now describes usage in credits, not a universally one-operation-per-module price.
A workflow with five billable actions, each charged as one Zapier task, running 1,000 times would consume 5,000 tasks. That is an illustrative model, not a measurement: exempt steps, retries, and differently metered actions can change usage. Make credits can also vary by module, AI use, or runtime.
Do not equate 50,000 workflow executions with 50,000 tasks or credits. Model the exact workflow under each vendor's current billing rules, then compare the required tiers on the same billing term. Taxes, optional services, and external API costs are excluded from the subscription figures above.
App coverage and integration quality
Zapier has an extensive integration catalog. Verify that it includes the exact trigger, action, and fields you need; a headline app count does not establish complete coverage of a workflow.
Make also maintains a large integration catalog. Compare supported actions, polling or webhook behavior, and authentication requirements for the actual applications rather than assuming its integrations are always deeper.
For common and niche apps alike, a connector listing is only a starting point. Test representative records and failure paths before committing.
If your stack is standard, either works. If your stack includes anything unusual, check both integration catalogs before you commit.
So which one
For operators new to automation, building simple workflows, and integrating with any weird tool in the stack, start with Zapier. Get the automation running, learn the mental model, and see if you have appetite for more.
For complex visual workflows, evaluate Make early. Model the billable usage and test maintenance tasks before relying on a saving at scale.
For teams already running both and wondering which to consolidate on, the honest answer is usually neither. The tools are different enough that having both, each doing what it does best, ends up more efficient than forcing one to do everything.
How to choose
- Building the required workflow
- Supported triggers and actions for the actual apps
- Subscription and billable usage for the proposed workload
- Workflow readability and maintenance
- Error handling and recovery
Final verdict
Evaluate Zapier for straightforward app connections and Make for visual workflow design. The cheaper option depends on billable actions, credits, and required features; this article does not establish a universal volume-based winner.
Our evaluation process
Research and methodology
Research-based comparison of current vendor pricing, published features, and the workflow needs described in this article, fact-checked September 9, 2026. Linked vendor sources are supplemented by attributed reporting where needed. Recommendations are editorial judgments; this article does not report a documented hands-on trial or measured performance benchmark.
Read our review methodologyFrequently asked questions
What about n8n? Should I self-host instead?
If you have technical operations chops and want to run your own infrastructure, yes, n8n is legitimately cheap at scale. Read the n8n alternatives comparison elsewhere on the site for the full picture. For teams without dedicated ops resources, Zapier or Make is the right answer.
Do these handle AI and LLM workflows?
Both offer AI and LLM integrations. Verify model availability, action support, credentials, and any separate AI or API charges for the intended workflow. This comparison has no documented benchmark establishing an overall agent-workflow leader.
How reliable are these for production workflows?
Test error handling, retries, monitoring, and a manual fallback for critical workflows. This research does not provide measured uptime or an SLA comparison; evaluate current service terms against the business requirement.
Sources & references
- Zapier pricing — ZapierAccessed
- Make pricing — MakeAccessed
- Make official annual Core pricing — MakeAccessed